Looking at pictures from the Bard scrimmage two ideas present themselves. Firstly, teams with weak marks, even one weak marker, are easy to beat on offense. Emphasizing team-wide tight mark defense for the rest of the semester will pay dividends.
Second, if you are close to the end zone line or another position when a short throw is the only option, if you don't have an easy to execute low release throw its probably a good idea to swing the disc. That's more of a personal issue, I don't swing it to the other handlers enough.
Also more often than not, a hammer should not be used as a high count bailout close to the endzone. That's something a lot of people find counterintuitive - since a hammer is nearly impossible to block and flies over the defenders, it is often used to get out of a tight spot at a high stall count. But at that point, if the swing is not open, either a flat low release throw under or through the defense, or a high flat throw are better.
Why? A hammer is a precision throw. If you put it up and the receiver is out of position, they have a very small margin for error. Meanwhile, a flat throw will float and give the receiver a chance to make up lost ground if they make a bad play or the throw itself is off target. In a high stall count situation the throw is more likely to be rushed, so a throw that provides a greater margin for error is a better choice.
The above is a direct result of looking at pictures of the blading hammer I threw to Tom. While it was on target, it made for a challenging reception and looking at the pictures I could have gone low release.
Why ever not go low release on the short throw?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment